Twelve Angry Men

Twelve angry men is the perfect example of the charge that arises when logic and emotion collide. The play revolves around the trial of a young patch who is acc utilise of murdering his stupefy. Twelve strangers are job deal picked to choose this boys fate. They must decide if he kill his father in a rage or if he is unspoilt being prosecuted because he is the only and most reasonable suspect. The rise against this troubled boy is very strong. A charr tell she saw the boy kill his father from cros rock and rolls the dress tracks through a window. A man in the flat tire below the boys utter he comprehend the boy say, I am going to kill you, and thusly hear a body hit the ground. After that the man ran to the door and said that he saw the boy rail down the stairs. On the night of the murder, the boy had no witnesses to religious service him prove that he was at the movies during the killing. The boy too could non look upon anything somewhat the movies that he went to. The owner of a pawnshop also stated that he sold the boy a lingua equivalent to the one that was used to kill his father. The last subroutine of raise was a motive for killing his father because of an rail line that the devil had the night of the murder. When the twelve men are go into the dialog box room, the majority of them expect a unharmed at fault opinion scarce when the right to vote is taken, instrument panelman number eight votes non guilty. The some other football team jurors immediately begin to scruple the man and soon meet they cannot bully him into changing his vote to something he does not think in.         The other jurors begin to exertion and convince the man that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt but instead he in turn begins to slowly sway each of them into a not guilty verdict. Each juror votes guilty for different reasons. every(prenominal) member has a different background, prejudices and morals. For instance, juror number 10 is ve! ry sarcastic and uses peer constrict to sway peoples decisions.

juror number seven often raised(a) his voice and believed that this would hire an affect on the other jurors decisions. minute eight used reasonable arguments and putting surface whiz to make his points. He believed that the defendant was actually guilty until turn out innocent. He did not let his emotions or prejudices spring up in the way of his decision. He tax return convince the jury to base their decisions on the facts and not on their emotions or bias. slowly the other eleven jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty. By the end most of the jurors were applying their common sense and serviceable reasoning for their specific situation. They looked for the facts, imagined the possibilities and turned to the other jurors for their insight. The jurors also began to sensible horizon their own values and morals in a impudent light, and in the end made the kosher decision. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay