Sociology Assignment 1

Running Head : Sociology Assignment _______________________________________________________________Summarize the contributions of Emile Durkheim , Max weber , and Karl Marx to the rout of sociology . Be sure to none any theoretical differences they may have had with one and only(a) an otherEmile Durkheim reinforced the complaisant method and affirm that the social reality /environment can be try objectively and empirically . Durkheim through his social facts was able to profane out d avow the foundation for empirical sociology not to mention his avowal of embodied consciousness which is termed as cultureMax Weber is considered to be one of the most influential figures in establishing sociology as an academic check into . He advocated the need for objectivity in the methodology of analyzing the social world which he saw a s multi-layered and whose dealings atomic number 18 interdependent . He introduced the concept of ideal types as a basis for the comparative degree abridgment of societiesKarl Marx placed an speech pattern on the economical and materialistic mickle of history and the structure of parliamentary honor . He grounded his ideas on the assertion that economic institutions are accustomed structures from which the rest of society is built on (superstructure . Weber unattached this Marxian conception of history which attempted to put into center the rally of economics as the cause and moverExplain the similarities and difference between the tierce major sociological opinions of geomorphological leanalism , impinge theory and emblematic inter litigateism . Identify which perspectives use a macro-level and a micro-level of analysisStructural functionalism centers on the morphological form of the society by further analyzing the social functions that give way /cause the se structures in place . Given its focus and! the violence on the normative and social systems it conducts itself in the macro-level of analysis action theory on the other hand sees singles in society as promoting their own self-interest and advantage thusly leading to a confrontation with others .

It is a theory grounded on seeing human creation as competitive and it is the latter(prenominal) that causes social change . We could view this as following from the dialectical established by Marx . The battle theory operates too in the macro-levelSymbolic Interactionism values and studies the self and how the individual creates meanings in social relations . It is far more soft in approach and belongs in the micro-level of analysis . It takes into account the interactions and the interpretations of agent mentioned by the actual participantsStructural functionalism and competitiveness theory are moderately opposing poles , perhaps imputable to the fact that both renders perspective at a macro-level of analysis . Durkheim is taken to be one of the influences of Structural functionalism thus it comes as no surprise that the consensus and collective agreement of functions arise . Marxian scene laid the premise from which the conflict theory operates . As such(prenominal) one sees society as building on function that blends and works---people have roles , and play the move available in a particular society . Conflict theory disagrees with this and sees social groups and classes as opposing each other that makes a society evolveDescribe what C . Wright...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you wa! nt to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay